The rule of law is that since the First Amendment leaves no room for the operation of a dual standard in the academic community with respect to the content of speech, and because the state University's action here cannot be justified as a nondiscriminatory application of reasonable rules governing conduct, the judgments of the courts below must be reversed.
Case Study of: Papish v. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri 410 U.S. 667 (1973)
Dylan Lepore 